GuruSetu

Search covers lesson titles, modules, summaries, and highlights. Titles rank first.

Lesson

Research-Driven Teaching

In and Beyond the Classroom · Pedagogy

GuruSetu original

Video

Lesson video

Members only

Sign in to watch this video.

We’ll email you a six-digit one-time code. You can still read the summary and additional resources below.

Sign in to watch

Lesson in brief

How to use prior-knowledge checks, inquiry, and classroom evidence to design and improve a course.

Feedback

Help us improve this lesson

Rate three aspects of the lesson and, if you wish, leave a note for the GuruSetu team.

Your ratings and written feedback are private. Other members cannot see them.

Sign in to share private feedback.

Your lesson ratings and written feedback are visible only to the GuruSetu team. They are never shown to other members.

Public Discussion

Comments

Keep comments specific to the lesson. Comments are subject to moderation, and replies are limited to one level.

Sign in to read or post comments.

Comments are visible to signed-in GuruSetu members. Your email stays private.

Summary

Summary, mindmap and highlights

Summary

What the video covers

Use inquiry to design the course and improve it

Mr. Prakash Hegade starts with Vygotsky's zone of proximal development: teaching should connect what students already know with something new that they can reach. Before class, give students a problem and use a short form to find out what they understand. Then build a case that bridges that starting point to the target concept. An LLM may help draft the case. The teacher sets the learning goal, provides the learner evidence and checks the result.

Build a research-driven syllabus around foundational principles and groups of essential concepts. Use a textbook's contents page and another university's syllabus as references, then adapt the structure to the course. Add current papers, industry cases and applications, balancing classics and contemporaries. A small special-topics unit can change each year. An industry colleague might help shape a unit or teach an applied part of it. A portfolio or a real product can suit work that changes with the field and provide authentic assessment.

Undergraduate research often begins with how a problem is framed. “Build an email system” points students towards a known solution. “Build a communication system” leaves room to define the problem, compare options and combine several disciplines. These open problems still need sensible boundaries for the course. Their value is that students must find new information and make design choices. Some ideas may also have social or entrepreneurial use.

Teaching itself can also be studied. Choose one classroom change and one focused question. Link it to a measurable learning outcome and name the construct you want to study, such as transfer, self-direction, application, critical thinking or analysis. Make the activity and rubric measure that construct. After the intervention, combine focused student interviews with a carefully written rating-scale survey. Look for agreement across the evidence and for saturation in the interviews, then compare the findings with the original question. Use the result to improve the next course offering, and report the method clearly enough for others to examine or reproduce it.

Review this lesson

Review

Test yourself with flashcards or write a private note.

Active recall

Answer before revealing the card

Add any card you want to practise. It will appear on the Review page when it is due.

Card

01 / 05

You can view every card before signing in.

For this lesson

Additional resources

Explore this carefully selected material to deepen your understanding of the topic and connect it with your teaching practice.