Lesson 02
Mapping Assessments to Course Outcomes
Assessment Principles · Assessment
Video
Lesson video
Members only
Sign in to watch this video.
We’ll email you a six-digit one-time code. You can still read the summary and additional resources below.
Sign in to watchFeedback
What did you think?
Choose any that fit. Signed-in members can see the totals.
Sign in to react.
Choose as many reactions as you like and see the totals. Reactions and comments use your profile name; your email stays private.
Sign inDiscussion
Comments
Keep comments specific to the lesson. Replies are limited to one level.
Sign in to read or post comments.
Comments are visible to signed-in GuruSetu members. Your email stays private.
Sign inSummary
Summary, mindmap and highlights
Constructive alignment joins three parts of course design: the outcomes students should achieve, the activities through which they practise, and the assessment evidence that will show achievement. The outcome supplies the destination and the level of performance. Its verb matters. Explain, analyse, design, and perform each call for different evidence.
Mapping begins with an outcome and works forward. If students must analyse an argument, a recall-only quiz is too narrow. They need practice identifying claims and evidence, comparing interpretations, and writing or presenting an analysis. The final task should then elicit that same kind of thinking under fair conditions.
A useful mapping table has one row per outcome and columns for practice, feedback, and assessment. Gaps become visible quickly: an outcome with no assessed evidence, a high-stakes task with little rehearsal, or an activity that consumes time without advancing an intended capability. Alignment creates coherence while still allowing teachers freedom in examples, methods, and student choice.
Concept map
Mindmap
Select a branch to collapse or expand it. Zoom as needed, then export the current view as a PNG.
Interactive map
Use the arrow keys to move through the map. Press Enter or Space on a branch to collapse or expand it.
- 01
Constructive alignment connects outcomes, learning activities, and assessment evidence.
- 02
The action verb in an outcome signals the performance students must demonstrate.
- 03
Assessment should elicit the same level and kind of thinking named in the outcome.
- 04
Practice and feedback prepare learners for that performance.
- 05
A mapping table reveals missing evidence, weak rehearsal, and redundant activity.
- 06
Alignment concerns coherence; it leaves room for varied methods and contexts.
Review this lesson
Review
Test yourself with flashcards or write a private note.
Active recall
Answer before revealing the card
Add any card you want to practise. It will appear on the Review page when it is due.
Card
01 / 05
Private notes
Your lesson notes
Write in Markdown, then switch to Preview to check the formatting. Your note is private and is saved when you choose Save.

Save a private note for this lesson.
Sign in to write a Markdown note. Download this note from the lesson or export all notes as a ZIP from your profile.
Sign in to writeFor this lesson
Additional resources
Use these readings and tools to check sources, extend the topic or apply it in your teaching.
Nanyang Technological University
Constructive Alignment
A clear outcomes-based account of aligning learning activities and assessment.
University of Wollongong
Designing aligned assessment
A practical guide to checking validity and alignment between tasks and learning outcomes.
University of Queensland Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation
Teaching frameworks and models
A broader course-design reference that includes constructive alignment and backward design.
Ghent University
What Is Constructive Alignment and Why Is It So Important?
Three direct questions for aligning competencies, learning activity, and assessment.


