GuruSetu

Search covers lesson titles, modules, summaries, and highlights. Titles rank first.

Lesson

Predatory Venues: How to Identify and Avoid Them

Publishing: Journals, Conferences and Beyond · Research

Curated video

Video

Lesson video

Members only

Sign in to watch this video.

We’ll email you a six-digit one-time code. You can still read the summary and additional resources below.

Sign in to watch

Lesson in brief

Think. Check. Submit. is a respected coalition built specifically for this decision. Its short video works as the entry point, while the checklist, DOAJ, and COPE turn the warning into a repeatable verification process.

Feedback

Help us improve this lesson

Rate three aspects of the lesson and, if you wish, leave a note for the GuruSetu team.

Your ratings and written feedback are private. Other members cannot see them.

Sign in to share private feedback.

Your lesson ratings and written feedback are visible only to the GuruSetu team. They are never shown to other members.

Public Discussion

Comments

Keep comments specific to the lesson. Comments are subject to moderation, and replies are limited to one level.

Sign in to read or post comments.

Comments are visible to signed-in GuruSetu members. Your email stays private.

Summary

Summary, mindmap and highlights

Summary

What the video covers

A questionable journal or conference often imitates the surface features of a credible venue. Before submitting, confirm the title, publisher, contact details, scope, editorial board, peer-review process, fees, copyright terms, archiving, and indexing through sources outside the venue’s own website.

Start with people and process. Check whether editors are real scholars who acknowledge the role, whether the venue explains review and correction, and whether recent content fits the stated field. Verify identifiers and indexing directly in the named database. For open-access journals, the Directory of Open Access Journals and recognised publishing organisations can add useful evidence.

Assess the full pattern. Sloppy messages, implausibly fast review, hidden charges, false metrics, copied websites, and pressure to pay or submit quickly all deserve investigation. Save the call, emails, policies, and receipts. Ask a librarian, supervisor, or experienced colleague when the evidence remains unclear. A deliberate check protects the paper, its authors, and the scholarly record.

Review this lesson

Review

Test yourself with flashcards or write a private note.

Active recall

Answer before revealing the card

Add any card you want to practise. It will appear on the Review page when it is due.

Card

01 / 05

You can view every card before signing in.

For this lesson

Additional resources

Explore this carefully selected material to deepen your understanding of the topic and connect it with your teaching practice.