GuruSetu

Search covers lesson titles, modules, summaries, and highlights. Titles rank first.

Lesson

On Ethics Clearances

Research Ethics and Integrity · Research

Curated video

Video

Lesson video

Members only

Sign in to watch this video.

We’ll email you a six-digit one-time code. You can still read the summary and additional resources below.

Sign in to watch

Lesson in brief

PAHO gives a precise primary-source explanation in two minutes. ICMR and WHO resources make the lesson actionable for Indian researchers and clarify that local rules determine the review pathway.

Feedback

Help us improve this lesson

Rate three aspects of the lesson and, if you wish, leave a note for the GuruSetu team.

Your ratings and written feedback are private. Other members cannot see them.

Sign in to share private feedback.

Your lesson ratings and written feedback are visible only to the GuruSetu team. They are never shown to other members.

Public Discussion

Comments

Keep comments specific to the lesson. Comments are subject to moderation, and replies are limited to one level.

Sign in to read or post comments.

Comments are visible to signed-in GuruSetu members. Your email stays private.

Summary

Summary, mindmap and highlights

Summary

What the video covers

A research ethics committee examines whether a study involving people has social and scientific value and whether its design can answer the question. Weak design can expose participants to burden or risk without producing useful knowledge, so methodology belongs inside ethical review.

The committee considers fair participant selection, risks and anticipated benefits, informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, data handling, community context, compensation, conflicts of interest, and protections for people who may face added vulnerability. It also checks whether the research team and site can carry out the protocol safely.

Approval normally comes before recruitment, data collection, or access to identifiable records. Researchers should submit the protocol, participant materials, consent process, tools, recruitment plans, data plan, and relevant agreements. Amendments, safety events, deviations, continuing review, and closure may require later reporting. Local rules determine which activities need full review, expedited review, exemption, or another form of institutional determination.

Review this lesson

Review

Test yourself with flashcards or write a private note.

Active recall

Answer before revealing the card

Add any card you want to practise. It will appear on the Review page when it is due.

Card

01 / 05

You can view every card before signing in.

For this lesson

Additional resources

Explore this carefully selected material to deepen your understanding of the topic and connect it with your teaching practice.